--Rule-based systems are a very popular form of explainable AI, particularly in the fuzzy community, where fuzzy rules are widely used for control and classification problems. However, fuzzy rule-based classifiers struggle to reach bigger traction outside of fuzzy venues, because users sometimes do not know about fuzzy and because fuzzy partitions are not so easy to interpret in some situations. In this work, we propose a methodology to reduce fuzzy rule-based classifiers to crisp rule-based classifiers. We study different possible crisp descriptions and implement an algorithm to obtain them. Also, we analyze the complexity of the resulting crisp classifiers. We believe that our results can help both fuzzy and non-fuzzy practitioners understand better the way in which fuzzy rule bases partition the feature space and how easily one system can be translated to another and vice versa. Our complexity metric can also help to choose between different fuzzy classifiers based on what the equivalent crisp partitions look like.

High-order Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy classifiers possess powerful classification performance yet have fewer fuzzy rules, but always be impaired by its exponential growth training time and poorer interpretability owing to High-order polynomial used in consequent part of fuzzy rule, while Low-order TSK fuzzy classifiers run quickly with high interpretability, however they usually require more fuzzy rules and perform relatively not very well. Address this issue, a novel TSK fuzzy classifier embeded with knowledge distillation in deep learning called HTSK-LLM-DKD is proposed in this study. HTSK-LLM-DKD achieves the following distinctive characteristics: 1) It takes High-order TSK classifier as teacher model and Low-order TSK fuzzy classifier as student model, and leverages the proposed LLM-DKD (Least Learning Machine based Decoupling Knowledge Distillation) to distill the fuzzy dark knowledge from High-order TSK fuzzy classifier to Low-order TSK fuzzy classifier, which resulting in Low-order TSK fuzzy classifier endowed with enhanced performance surpassing or at least comparable to High-order TSK classifier, as well as high interpretability; specifically 2) The Negative Euclidean distance between the output of teacher model and each class is employed to obtain the teacher logits, and then it compute teacher/student soft labels by the softmax function with distillating temperature parameter; 3) By reformulating the Kullback-Leibler divergence, it decouples fuzzy dark knowledge into target class knowledge and non-target class knowledge, and transfers them to student model. The advantages of HTSK-LLM-DKD are verified on the benchmarking UCI datasets and a real dataset Cleveland heart disease, in terms of classification performance and model interpretability.

Fuzzy c-means based clustering algorithms are frequently used for Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy classifier antecedent parameter estimation. One rule is initialized from each cluster. However, most of these clustering algorithms are unsupervised, which waste valuable label information in the training data. This paper proposes a supervised enhanced soft subspace clustering (SESSC) algorithm, which considers simultaneously the within-cluster compactness, between-cluster separation, and label information in clustering. It can effectively deal with high-dimensional data, be used as a classifier alone, or be integrated into a TSK fuzzy classifier to further improve its performance. Experiments on nine UCI datasets from various application domains demonstrated that SESSC based initialization outperformed other clustering approaches, especially when the number of rules is small.

The Era of Big Data has forced researchers to explore new distributed solutions for building fuzzy classifiers, which often introduce approximation errors or make strong assumptions to reduce computational and memory requirements. As a result, Big Data classifiers might be expected to be inferior to those designed for standard classification tasks (Small Data) in terms of accuracy and model complexity. To our knowledge, however, there is no empirical evidence to confirm such a conjecture yet. Here, we investigate the extent to which state-of-the-art fuzzy classifiers for Big Data sacrifice performance in favor of scalability. To this end, we carry out an empirical study that compares these classifiers with some of the best performing algorithms for Small Data. Assuming the latter were generally designed for maximizing performance without considering scalability issues, the results of this study provide some intuition around the tradeoff between performance and scalability achieved by current Big Data solutions. Our findings show that, although slightly inferior, Big Data classifiers are gradually catching up with state-of-the-art classifiers for Small data, suggesting that a unified learning algorithm for Big and Small Data might be possible.